Regulations Summit must follow for affordability
[Note: For more recent information about Summit’s proposal for Lyons Valley Park, see this column.]
Some Lyons Valley Park homeowners have posted on social media and in Lyons Recorder comments pages expressing concerns about oversight of the affordable rental homes that Summit Housing Groups proposes for Lyons Valley Park, how and when Summit could sell the buildings, how long the rentals must be affordable to households of specific incomes, and specific requirements for the renters themselves.
We know for sure that the federal funding sources that Summit Housing Group plans to use for homes in Lyons Valley Park come with several layers of requirements and oversight that regulate long-term affordability. Summit was approved for both Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) and the Community Development Block Grants – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding in 2019.
To find out the specifics, I did some research on the LIHTC requirements, administered here in Colorado by the Colorado Housing Finance Authority (CHFA). The oversight and compliance for LIHTC is so complex that I can only focus on it in this week’s column. I’ll have more information in the future about any additional requirements for CDBG-DR funding.
Required reporting for LIHTC
According to CHFA’s LIHTC Manual, the U.S. Congress enacted the LIHTC program through the Tax Reform Act of 1986, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury is responsible for the administration of the LIHTC program. The LIHTC program is governed by Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The introduction further explains, “Under the Code, each state is required to designate a ‘housing credit agency’ to allocate the credits. The State of Colorado has designated CHFA to allocate tax credits and monitor compliance.”
CHFA compliance is extensive. The LIHTC funding has many regulations listed on the CHFA page. The forms page list is long. Annual submission forms include Owner Certification of Continuing Program Compliance. There are more than 25 Resident Certification/Verification Forms, and residents must report household income and household assets.
I also learned from talking with an investor in LIHTC projects that investor committees do extensive review to keep their risk low. Loan holders also have oversight.
Requirements about selling LIHTC properties and long-term affordability of the homes
Properties financed using the LIHTC must maintain affordability for 30 years. The first 15 years (the “compliance” period) are monitored by the IRS, and the second 15 years (the “extended use” period) are monitored by CHFA. Those two periods each have a compliance manual on the CHFA website.
During those 30 years, a property owner that used the LIHTC program cannot sell unless the buyer will continue to operate under the same rules and regulations and CHFA oversight. To avoid loss or recapture of tax credits, if the owners would need to find a buyer expected to continue to operate the property as a qualified low-income building for the remainder of the compliance and extended use period. Owners must be in compliance with the LIHTC program requirements at the time of the proposed transfer, and transfer fees may be required. CHFA’s written consent is required prior to any transfer of ownership. Owners are advised to review the Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA) specific to each property for additional requirements.
After that period, there are specific rules about how the units could be converted to market-rate, with an additional several years of protection of existing tenants. Owners are able to reinvest tax credits.
Summit has a history of keeping the ownership of Summit properties, managed by its own property management company.
Requirements for tenants in LIHTC properties
Affordability required by LIHTC is affordable rents for households at 30 percent to 60 percent of the area median income (varies on household size). According to the LIHTC compliance manual, a low-income unit is rent-restricted and occupied by a household who qualifies under the applicable set-aside restriction of 50 percent or 60 percent of the area median income (AMI).
To understand the AMI for Boulder County and what 60 percent means for various household sizes, see 2019 Colorado County Income and Rent Tables. Specific requirements for each property are detailed in the property’s regulatory agreement or LURA.
The income of tenants is evaluated every year as part of a lease, which means that households with income above the limits wouldn’t be able to renew the lease and would have to move out. This is the required affordability that many Lyons neighbors have expressed concern about–that the rentals would remain open for households at 60 percent of the area median income.
Residents must report household income and household assets, and a final tax document is vetted for each tenant as part of a much larger review.
Next step for Summit’s development plan in the Town of Lyons: March 10 public hearing
The March 10 public hearing notice for Summit Housing Group’s development plan before the Lyons Planning and Community Development Commission is listed on the town website public notices page. This development plan process is for the 21 units of multifamily housing, called Lyons Valley Townhomes, proposed for Tract A of Filing No. 8 of the Lyons Valley Park subdivision. (The 19 single-family homes that Summit also plans to build are on lots already platted and entitled, requiring only standard building permits like elsewhere in town.)
The public hearing for this development plan is both open to the public to attend and includes time for public comment. The meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. at Lyons Town Hall. Development plan documents from Summit are also posted on the town website.
Thanks for the info; clears up some issues. The March 10 PCDC hearing MUST address the entire 40-unit development, not just the 21 town homes. Remember, this is the one and only time that residents will be able to comment on and ask questions about the final plans. We’ve never seen them before. The Town has afforded residents the opportunity to review the final plans, fiscal impact study, traffic study, stormwater study, etc. – each of which addresses the entire development. Why then would they not be allowed to ask questions or make comments to the entire development?
Thanks for your comment, Greg. I’m glad your questions about Low-Income Housing Tax Credit requirements were answered.
About the additional question about whether neighbors can comment on the 19 single family home lots that Summit also plans to purchase:
I’m sure that as a candidate for the Board of Trustees you are learning about town processes. The Development Plan process is triggered by specific situations like multifamily housing (like the proposal for 21 townhomes on Tract A of Filing No. 8 of the Lyons Valley Park subdivision), but the 19 individually platted single family homes lots already come with a right for the property owners to build single family homes through the Building Permit Process. Do you want the opportunity for neighbors to review final plans for all single family home lots in the Town of Lyons before someone can get a building permit and proceed with building – or just these because they are intended for low-income households?
Great article Amy. I saw in one of the Summit documents that the development has the standard 15 year compliance period plus a 25 year “waiver”. Does that mean there is guaranteed compliance for 40 years?
Hi, Chris – Thanks. I’m not sure if that adds up to a total of 40 years or if it’s still a minimum of 30 that I saw in other documents for LIHTC in Colorado. I’m hoping to either hear back from an expert or to hear the more specific answer at the March 10 Development Plan Review. But it’s a minimum of 30 years for sure, based on how LIHTC compliance is managed in Colorado by CHFA.
Consider for a moment: residents were given opportunity to review traffic, financial, storm water and environmental studies for the ENTIRE development. Why would we not have chance to comment?
Hi Greg. Again, as a candidate running for the Board of Trustees, do you understand the town Development Plan process? Here’s the information I have about it: The Development Plan process is specifically for the 21 townhomes for Tract A for Filing No. 8 of the Lyons Valley Park Subdivision and allows commenting on all the documents that are provided as part of that development plan at both http://www.townoflyons.com/648/Tract-A-Lyons-Valley-Park-filing-no-8 and in the “packet” of materials at the March 10 Development Plan Public Hearing meeting, which are online here: http://www.townoflyons.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_03102020-1364?html=true
A lot more info is in my column this week: https://lyonsrecorder.org/2020/03/05/march-10-public-hearing-on-summits-development-plan/
And you didn’t answer my earlier question: Do you want the opportunity for neighbors to review final plans for all single family home lots in the Town of Lyons before someone can get a building permit and proceed with building?